When vets make mistakes, pets pay the price

September 14th, 2011 at 3:00 am EST

I was sent a somewhat disturbing story on veterinary
mistakes and then what happens to the pets.

Does this happen often?

Nope.

But does it happen?

Yes.

The most important thing that you can do is to
be very particular about who is your Veterinarian,
and to be an INVOLVED Pet Owner- take matters into your own hands.

Ask a TONNE of questions.

Expect GREAT care for your dog or cat.

And perform much of this yourself.

This is a great way to start:

http://www.theonlinevet.com


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Owners outraged over botched surgeries, medication errors, misdiagnoses
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

By JoNel Aleccia
Health writer
msnbc.com


Jared Genser was a day away from euthanizing his family dog,
Finnegan, when the Washington, D.C. lawyer discovered that the
lab's diagnosis of a painful and deadly bone cancer was wrong.

Jenn Diederich of Riverton, Utah, sent her dog, Ted, for surgery
to repair a torn ligament in a right rear leg, only to find that
the veterinarian had operated on the left leg instead.

And Stefani Olsen of Silver Spring, Md., returned from a weekend
business trip to discover that the clinic where she'd boarded her
elderly diabetic cat, Toonces, had overdosed him with 10 times the
amount of insulin he needed, leaving the animal blind, wracked with
seizures and suffering from severe brain damage that lasted until
his death.

"It goes beyond heartbreak," said Olsen, a 45-year-old health
information technician who'd had the 15-year-old cat since he
was a kitten.

If any of these mistakes had occurred in human patients, they'd be
classified as medical errors worthy of investigation, public
reporting and professional discipline, including dismissal.

Wrong-site surgery and medication overdoses, for instance, are among
the so-called "never events" regarded as inexcusable in a human
health care setting.

But because the errors occurred in animals, owners and advocates
say they were ignored, minimized or outright denied by a system
that devalues the bond between pets and their owners and fails to
hold veterinarians sufficiently accountable when they make mistakes.

--------------------------
'Woefully inadequate'
--------------------------

"When someone's companion animal is injured by a veterinarian,
their choices are between slim and none," said Joyce Tischler,
founder and general counselor for the Animal Legal Defense Fund,
a Cotati, Calif., group that fields several calls a month about
pet medical errors.

"Action against veterinarians is woefully inadequate," she added.

Owners of injured animals say they're stunned to discover state
veterinary boards that dismiss up to 80 percent of the complaints
filed against their members, and a legal system that regards pets
as mere property, with no way to recover damages for emotional loss.

Laws vary, but in most state courts animals are worth their market
value, plus perhaps any economic value they generate for their
owners, Tischler said. That could be a considerable amount of
money for a high-value show dog or a racehorse, for instance,
but for most household pets, it's not.

"If you have a 10-year-old mixed-breed dog, the value of that dog
is generally considered to be under $100," Tischler said. "It's a
sad situation, it's an unfair situation for people who care about
their animals and are quite shocked to find when their animal is
killed or injured they cannot sue."

But industry advocates and vets themselves say that such rhetoric
overstates the problem. They contend that mistakes occur only in a
tiny fraction of the nearly 190 million for veterinary visits for
dogs, cats, birds and horses each year, and that there is adequate
monitoring and discipline when they do happen.

"I guess I don't agree that there is a lot of malpractice out
there," said Adrian Hochstadt, assistant director of state
legislative and regulatory affairs for the American Veterinary
Medical Association, which represents about 80,000 vets.

"If there are negligent doctors -- and there are probably a few in
every system -- if it's a big problem, it would have been addressed
by legislation," he added.

------------------------------
No tracking of vet errors
------------------------------

It's difficult to know how often medical errors occur in pets. The
AVMA collects no statistics on veterinary malpractice suits,
Hochstadt said, and the group's associated Professional Liability
Insurance Trust, or PLIT, which offers malpractice insurance for
vets, refused to release numbers or outcomes of such cases.

One small study of veterinary errors, a 2004 paper published in the
journal Veterinary Record, found that 78 percent of recent
veterinary graduates surveyed in Scotland and England admitted
making a mistake that could have endangered an animal. It's not
clear whether those results can be extrapolated to the larger
profession, however.

In the absence of better data, most industry experts look to human
medicine, where medical errors kill as many as 98,000 people a year,
and likely more, according to a decade-old Institute of Medicine
report widely regarded as a baseline.

"There's no reason to think that it's so different than what occurs
in humans," said Kathleen Bonvicini, chief executive of the
Institute for Healthcare Communication Inc., a New Haven, Conn.,
nonprofit that had to add sessions on veterinary errors several
years ago to address a growing demand.

The AVMA stands by the state discipline system, Hochstadt said. At
the same time, the group has staunchly opposed efforts to allow
courts to impose non-economic damages for animals, arguing that the
move would drive up costs, push vets out of the profession and
create many of the problems found in the medical malpractice realm
for humans.

"Our position is that the current legal structure is working well,"
Hochstadt said.

That sentiment outrages some pet owners, prompting them to take
their plight to the Internet. Greg Munson, 44, a Mesquite, Texas,
businessman created the Web site www.vetsfromhell.net after the
2005 death of his beloved 8-year-old Shih Tzu, Stempy, from an
alleged veterinary error after surgery for a bladder stone.

Munson's site, which features flaming letters and "story after
story of EVIL Vets from HELL," was designed to gain attention -- and
prompt action, Munson said.

"Vets in this country literally get away with murder," Munson said.
"Even when a vet board does hold a vet accountable, it's nothing
more than a slap on the wrist."

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////

P.S. So what is the REAL instance of Veterinary Errors?

Well we don't know, except that by comparison, Doctors are the 3rd
leading cause of death in the U.S. - causing 250,000 deaths a year-
and that is according to stats from JAMA.

Our dog and cat population is approx 1/3 of the human population-
by comparison that could mean 100,000 pets dying a year due to
Veterinary Error.

My point of all this is that it happens- and because there is NO
central reporting of it, we Don't know the real numbers.

Don't let your pet become one of these stats.

Become an EMPOWERED Pet Owner.

Here is a great way to start:

http://www.theonlinevet.com

Heal your pet at home!

Best Wishes,

Dr Andrew Jones, DVM



DISCLAIMER: This information is for educational
purposes only and is not intended to replace the
advice of your own veterinarian. Dr Andrew Jones
resigned from the College of Veterinarians of
B.C. effective December  1 2010, meaning he
cannot answer specific questions about your
pet's medical issues or make specific medical
recommendations for your pet.


PRIVACY POLICY: We will never rent, sell, loan,
provide, barter, exchange or in any way make
available your personal information to others.
You can unsubscribe or change your email address
at anytime using the links at the bottom of this
email.






Copyright 2011 Four Paws Online Ltd.

Tel: 1-800-396-1534