Herd immunity is a hypothesis plucked out of an old college text book. It
states that large groups of immune people are able to protect the
immune-compromised or unvaccinated. In other words, herd immunity serves
as a human shield – a type of immunity – for “at-risk” individuals.

And without question, vaccines are said to induce it. But remember,
it’s only a hypothesis…as old as 1840!

To test herd immunity, you simply have to monitor a highly vaccinated (or
even naturally-immune) group for an outbreak. If anyone among the herd is
infected, then obviously, herd immunity doesn’t work. And this is
exactly what’s been found over the last few decades.

In Corpus Christi, where the vaccine rate was 99%, measles was undeterred
and infected adolescents who received their shots. Scientists writing for
The New England Journal of Medicine documenting the spread, concluded that,
“outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than
99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent
are immune.”

Echoing these findings, The American Journal of Public Health showed a 98%
vaccine rate at a Massachusetts high school. This didn't stop a measles
outbreak from erupting among the heavily vaccinated “herd.”

Proponents of herd immunity will insist that the failures should be met
with yet more vaccines, reaching as high as 100%…but that’s no longer
herd immunity, it’s vaccine-induced protection, by definition. And even
then, the herd is still vulnerable! In Illinois, the Centers for Disease
Control and Protection (CDC) documented an outbreak despite a 100% vaccine
rate in a Sangamon County high school.

In Emerging Infectious Diseases, scientist discovered whooping cough
outbreaks among fully “immunized” populations of children as well.
Their research - published by the CDC found that, “Vaccinated adolescents
and adults may serve as reservoirs for silent infection and become
potential transmitters to unprotected infants (3-11).”

You can go back as far as the first test tube and find these same results,
repeated among different “herds.” That’s because the herd immunity doesnt
exist outside of textbooks and pharmaceutical propaganda.

Ignoring or refusing to learn the facts when outbreaks arise, health
officials are quick to state that it’s due to a breakdown in “herd
immunity.” Doctors parrot it too, without even looking at the research.
They say it’s happening more often nationwide as states make it easier
for parents to opt out of vaccinations.

Like argumentative apes, pro-vaccine parents and their physicians start
pounding their chest in favor of such statements. More incredulous, they
attack anti-vaccine parents, accusing them of “putting vaccinated kids at
risk due to a breakdown in herd immunity.” This is fuzzy logic. And
it’s borderline stupid. After all, if vaccines truly worked, then why
would vaccinated kids be at risk?

Ultimately, the facts are clear. Senselessly jabbing tribes of kids with
dozens of new-fangled shots isn't going to help anyone. Therefore, herd
immunity is nothing more than a silly catch-phrase - spawned by those who
profit from vaccines - used to scare and bully parents into vaccinating
their children.

If pro-vaccine advocates, the media and doctors really cared about
protecting kids, they’d stop using an unproven hypothesis like herd
immunity to question parents who opt out. Instead, a more level-headed
approach would be to question the obvious factors seen above that are
detracting from our kids health - a lack of herd immunity, waning vaccine
efficacy or all out vaccine failure and the spread of disease by the
vaccinated! Healthy skepticism can go a long way in asking the obvious
question: What's the best way to boost immunity?

Learn more at www.getimmunefx.com

Dare to live young!

The People's Chemist

P.S. If you rely on vitamin C in a package or pill, vitamin D or EmergenC,
you'll want to take 5 minutes to learn how to truly boost immunity
and avoid illness and antibiotics: www.getimmunefx.com