June 7, 2023
The Red Flag special session poses a constitutional problem for legislators
Governor Bill Lee, who identifies as a Republican, has called for a Red Flag style law
to be passed in Tennessee since shortly after the Covenant School
murders. In addition, some legislators, who also identify as
Republicans, have expressed open support for a red flag law including Lt. Governor Randy McNally.
When the Republican controlled Legislature adjourned rather than
passing Bill Lee’s Red Flag law, he was clearly upset. Shortly after
the Legislature adjourned, Bill Lee exercised his constitutional
authority to order the Legislature back to undertake a Red Flag Special Session
which is expected to start on August 21, 2023. Of course, almost all
Democrat legislators and an unsurprising number of Republicans are
cheering the Red Flag Special Session. Some Republicans,
however, are taking a firm stand that there will be no Red Flag law
passed in Tennessee, at least not with their support. Of course, since
there are a significant number of Republicans who could join with
Democrats and Bill Lee in his open gun control agenda, the fact that
some Republicans, even perhaps a majority of the Republican caucuses
oppose a Red Flag law is no assurance that Bill Lee will not further
embrace the Democrats to prove that his proposed gun control law should
be law in Tennessee. But this “Alice in Wonderland” scenario
which has arisen at the hands of Bill Lee poses a potential
constitutional predicament for some Republicans. Why? Well one
obvious reason is that most Republicans campaign as strong Second
Amendment supporters. Some attend all the local GOP functions to kiss
babies, serve as “master of ceremonies” and make speeches about how
conservative they are. They are already on the campaign trail for
re-election in August and November 2024. These current
legislators all take an oath of office – an oath that is required by and
prescribed in the state’s Constitution. Article X, Section 2 states:
Section 2. Each member of the Senate and House of Representatives, shall before they proceed to business take an oath or affirmation to support the Constitution of this state, and of the United States
and also the following oath: I______ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that
as a member of this General Assembly, I will, in all appointments, vote
without favor, affection, partiality, or prejudice; and that I
will not propose or assent to any bill, vote or resolution, which shall
appear to me injurious to the people, or consent to any act or thing,
whatever, that shall have a tendency to lessen or abridge their rights
and privileges, as declared by the Constitution of this state.
(emphasis added)
Thus, these individuals take an oath to put their loyalty to the
constitutions of the United States and the state of Tennessee above
anything else including party loyalty, donor “perks”, or even other laws
such as state statues. This constitutional oath of stewardship also
take precedent over the operational rules of the House or Senate. So,
why is this important? Well, although it is frequently ignored and
breached, it is a sworn oath to put their loyalties first on the
constitutions and also an oath not to take any action that would even
have a “tendency” to “lessen or abridge” any of the rights of citizens.
Obviously, that includes the rights which the Second Amendment declares
shall not be infringed. Now, we all know from just a simple review of
current Tennessee statutes and regulations that legislators, including
many current ones, have violated this oath over and over and over
throughout the state’s history. But how is this relevant to Bill Lee’s Red Flag special session? The
fact is that while Bill Lee is the governor, he is not the king –
despite what he and many in his party may believe. He cannot make law.
His job, as the chief of the executive branch, is to implement the laws
that are passed by the legislature. Certainly he can ask the
Legislature to pass a law or to pass his budget, but all he has the
constitutional authority to do is ask. Since the governor
cannot file any bills in the Legislature, that means some legislator
would have to file any legislation that might be requested by the
governor. Typically, that “honor” is held by those legislators who are
the caucus leaders of the governor’s party in the legislature. In
general practice now, that honor falls to William Lamberth who is the
House Republican caucus leader and Jack Johnson who is the Senate
Republican caucus leader. Of course, the honor might be given to others,
perhaps even including members of the other party, but generally we can
expect that Rep. Lamberth and Sen. Johnson will be asked to introduce
the Governor’s Red Flag law. Indeed, some reports from Sumner county
indicate that Rep. Lamberth has recently that he would be the one filing
the Governor’s legislation in the Red Flag special session. Sen.
Johnson (unless there is another secretly recorded audio statement
concerning what Sen. Johnson apparently actually believes) has not
indicated publicly, to our knowledge, whether he will file the
Governor’s Red Flag legislation in the Senate. So what is the constitutional predicament?
All of these Legislators take the same constitutional oath. In order
to keep their oath, they would have to believe that the Governor’s Red
Flag law does not violate the constitutional prohibition contained the
the Second Amendment or Article I, Section 26 of the Tennessee
Constitution. In order to keep their oath, these legislators filing
the Governor’s Red Flag legislation must be able to show that such
legislation would not and could not, in any manner, “appear to
me injurious to the people, or consent to any act or thing, whatever,
that shall have a tendency to lessen or abridge their rights and
privileges, as declared by the Constitution of this state.“
Perhaps
a legislator could assert that they don’t believe in Red Flag laws and
will not vote to pass them but that its his or her “duty” to file the
Governor’s Red Flag legislation. Perhaps they could assert that while
they will not vote for a Red Flag law they are willing to file it in
order to give the Democrats and left leaning Republicans the opportunity
to pass it. Perhaps they could argue that while they will not vote for
it, they still believe that a Red Flag law does not violate the 2nd
Amendment or any other provisions of the constitution and that such a
law would never “lessen or abridge” a citizen’s rights.
Parse
it any way possible but the fact is that any legislator who claims to be
a conservative, who claims to support the constitutions, who claims to
be a 2nd Amendment protector but who then either files or supports the
Governor’s or anyone else’s Red Flag laws should be viewed with
suspicion. Once the Governor’s special session gets here, perhaps the
legislators will carefully consider their oaths of office and tell the
Governor – no, just no. Will they do that? We will know in August.
|