Other Stuff
Over the coming weeks I’ll spend some time describing the formula we use to try and find companies that have the propensity to outperform the markets, potential multi baggers. As some of you know we have a set criteria we use to determine what companies, mostly nanocaps and microcaps, that have the common traits that we have historically seen to give us the best chance of early discovery of long term compounders. I’ll try to describe what these criteria are and why we believe they lead to strong outperformance.
Growth
If you want to find a stock that has the chance to multi bag it’s almost impossible to have that happen with out seeing strong growth in the business and while that is obviously the desire of almost every business it’s much harder to come by than most people think. We aren’t talking about potential growth. We want to see existing growth, growth in revenues and of course more importantly growth in profit. And the faster the growth the greater the potential for growth in share price, faster growing companies increase value faster.
A mistake I see a lot of investors make is they think they have to buy potential growth to get outstanding results. I can tell you from experience that what you want to find is existing growth that the market isn’t valuing properly. Thermal Energy from above is a great example.
Another interesting dynamic investors struggle with is that they have a hard time properly valuing rapidly growing companies. Investors tend to have a bias towards traditional value investing, where balance sheets and book value tethers their idea of what value actually means. This leads them to tend to under-price rapidly growing companies, especially when they are still small and have all of a sudden hit some kind of important inflection point. What this allows sophisticated investors to do is buy hyper growing companies at realistic “value” type of prices. You’ve probably heard the term GARP (Growth At a Reasonable Price), in the nanocap and microcap sector often you’ll get the chance to enjoy GASP (Growth At a Stupid Price).
Sometimes investors struggle valuing hyper growing nanocaps because many of these companies operate in niches and investors struggle to understand what the total addressable market may be and if it feels small then investors can’t see long term growth. I love small companies that are starting to dominate a niche market. They tend to be able to maintain higher margins because of lack of competition and often find parallel niches to exploit and grow. Almost all big companies started as small companies and by exploiting a niche.
Ok, so when we look for revenue growth, we look for companies growing fast, ideally at least 25% year over year or greater. And it’s important to point out that we are looking for that growth on a per share basis. It’s almost always pointless to grow revenues at 25% if the company is issuing 25% more new shares. In rare instances growing the share count and revenue may have a positive impact on the earnings per share but when all things are equal we want to default to growth per share.
We look at quarterly performance first and we want to see this result on a year over year basis. Sometimes there is some seasonality in the business and some quarters are seasonally stronger or weaker and we need to account for that. If there is no seasonality and revenues are consistently growing every quarter this is even better. And more quarters of hyper growth means more likeliness that growth will keep going at a similar pace. Remember though, there is the law of small numbers. It’s easier to grow smaller revenues at a fast pace than it is to grow very big numbers at a fast pace. It is usually why historically smaller companies used to garner higher valuation metrics (price to earnings, enterprise value to earnings etc).
Give more weight to latest quarter. We are watching for inflection points and many times it will show in a quarterly report. This could be triggered by the launch of a new product, an acquisition, a new business division, new business model or a host of other things. We want to identify why there has been a strong change in revenues. And watching for early inflection point likely means we are at a very early stage of the discovery process.
We also want to watch for growth in other metrics, ie bookings, backlog, deferred revenue etc. One great place to find these metrics are in the company’s MD&A. We love to review the MD&A for clues as to why there has been a big jump in revenues and perhaps if this change has staying power.
A company showing a rapid rate of growth is usually an indication that the company’s products are finding their mark. A growing number of customers want the product or want more of it. Revenue growth can tell you so much that it should not be ignored. And unlike companies that promise growth this promise has already been realized limiting the risk that the company doesn’t meet its promise. How many times have we seen companies with great promise and potential just not show those results. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush….
By no means is rapid growth in revenue the only thing to look for but it is a vitally important metric if you want to shrink the large list of investment opportunities to those that have a strong chance of turning into a multi bagger.
Next week we’ll talk a bit about what we look for in terms of a company’s profitability.
This Week I’m Reading: Trading in the Zone – Mark Douglas - Douglas uncovers the underlying reasons for lack of consistency and helps traders overcome the ingrained mental habits that cost them money. He takes on the myths of the market and exposes them one by one teaching traders to look beyond random outcomes, to understand the true realities of risk, and to be comfortable with the "probabilities" of market movement that governs all market speculation.
To your wealth,
Paul and Trevor