Subject: How General Counsel Can Proactively Manage Labor Relations Today: LRI INK

October 17, 2024

To visit the blog post, click on the link below the article.

How General Counsel Can Proactively Manage Labor Relations Today

by Phil Wilson

General Counsel have a lot on their plates today. These complex challenges go far beyond traditional legal issues: data privacy and cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, ESG, antitrust, shareholder activism, corporate governance, and much more. One issue rising to the top of that list of risks is one many General Counsel haven’t had to deal with historically: labor relations risk.

 

In today’s labor landscape, companies must remain vigilant and proactive to manage employee relations effectively. A reactive approach, responding only when issues arise, is no longer sufficient. General Counsel must lead their organizations in adopting a "left of boom" approach—a proactive strategy designed to anticipate, address, and mitigate labor-related challenges before they escalate into larger problems.

 

The "Left of Boom" Strategy: Staying Ahead of Crises

The phrase "left of boom" refers to acting before a crisis (the "boom") occurs. A company focused on staying left of boom identifies vulnerabilities, engages employees proactively, and takes early actions to avoid labor disruptions. General Counsel must instill this mentality across leadership to ensure that labor relations are not a last-minute scramble but an ongoing commitment to fostering a healthy workplace culture.

Key components of this approach include:

  • Identifying vulnerabilities early: Counsel should encourage their organizations to assess internal and external risks related to labor issues. This includes evaluating employee engagement, union presence, and workplace culture. By maintaining a constant pulse on these elements, companies can spot potential labor conflicts before they become major issues.

  • Training supervisors: Supervisors are often the first line of defense in labor relations. Their ability to detect and address early warning signs, such as changes in employee mood, disengagement, or rumors, is crucial. Leadership should be trained to be approachable and recognize when small issues may become larger concerns.

Why Many Labor Strategies Fail

Many companies fail at labor relations because they do not focus enough on fostering a strong, direct relationship with employees. These failures often stem from inconsistent communication, unapproachable leaders, and poor risk assessment. Failing to "run to the smoke"—or address issues immediately when they arise—leads to situations spiraling out of control.

 

For example, new hire orientation and training are often missed opportunities. Instead of fostering loyalty and embedding the company’s values, these processes are often rushed or disjointed. General Counsel should seek reassurance from HR leaders that these touchpoints are used effectively to communicate the company's direct relationship philosophy and set clear expectations about the labor environment, including the company's stance on unions.

 

Building a Culture That Reduces Labor Vulnerability

One of the best ways to minimize labor relations problems is to create a culture where employees feel valued, respected, and engaged. Many General Counsel don’t see how a focus on culture impacts legal risk. However, employees who fit the company's culture and are motivated by the company’s mission are much less likely to create or ignore legal issues. Here are some strategies General Counsel can implement to foster a positive culture:


1.    Ensure the business hires and onboards effectively: Ensure that the hiring process lawfully screens for individuals who align with the company’s values. Use onboarding to communicate the company’s goals, values, and expectations transparently. Avoid overselling the job to prevent “buyer’s remorse,” which can lead to disengagement and disappointment down the road. Instead, be transparent and set clear expectations.


2.    Ensure the business fosters open communication: Lack of communication also creates legal risk. Communication not only reduces misunderstandings that can spiral into “boom” events but also can be helpful evidence in future litigation. Multi-channel communication is critical. Use various platforms such as 1:1 meetings, email, text, and employee feedback channels to ensure that no one feels out of the loop. Leadership must over-communicate important messages, as research shows that employees need to hear a message multiple times before it truly resonates.


3.    Measure and promote “net promoter” culture: Employee net promoter score (eNPS) is a key indicator of whether employees will recommend the company to others. General Counsel aren’t drivers of employee engagement. Nevertheless, changes in this metric are a leading indicator of employee relations legal risk. Positive employee sentiment increases engagement and reduces the chances of employment litigation and potential labor unrest.

 

Proactive Employee Engagement: The Frontline of Labor Relations

Employee engagement is critical for fostering a positive work environment that reduces the likelihood of employment litigation and unionization efforts. General Counsel should encourage their businesses to focus on creating programs and systems that empower employees and make them feel heard. This includes involving employees in decision-making processes whenever possible, which increases their sense of ownership and connection to the company.

 

Most important is making sure the business focuses heavily on training supervisors to detect subtle changes in employee behavior, such as tension, disengagement, or reduced organizational citizenship. These are other leading indicators—now getting much closer to “boom”—that companies can lawfully investigate and address potential issues before they escalate. These early detection systems allow companies to stay left of boom and avoid costly litigation and labor disputes.

 

Preparing for the Right of Boom: If Problems Arise

Despite best efforts, some labor issues may still arise. It is important that General Counsel make sure the business has a plan in place for when they cross over to “right of boom”—the point at which an issue has escalated. This includes:

  • Response tools: Developing a communication plan and a response team for when labor disputes occur. These teams should be prepared to manage campaigns, respond to employee concerns, and mitigate the spread of misinformation.

  • Bargaining strategies: In the event of unionization efforts or labor disputes, companies must have a well-developed bargaining strategy. General Counsel should prepare for negotiations by training a team that can lead these discussions effectively.

  • Strike preparation: While rare, companies should always be prepared for the possibility of a strike. This includes having contingency plans in place to ensure business continuity.

 Conclusion: Proactivity as a Long-Term Investment

Proactive labor relations are not a one-time fix but an ongoing commitment. General Counsel must lead the charge in building a culture that values transparency, communication, and employee engagement. By staying left of boom and addressing issues before they escalate, companies can avoid the pitfalls of labor disputes and foster a more resilient and loyal workforce. The strategies outlined above provide a roadmap for maintaining positive labor relations in today’s ever-changing environment.

A Healthcare Relapse: California Calamities And A Michigan Double Whammy

by Kimberly Ricci

An old saga is new again in the healthcare industry, where we will catch up on union woes in California and Michigan with a Minnesota chaser:

 

California: Kaiser Permanente’s workplace woes seem to never end after a coalition of unions dug their claws into the healthcare consortium. Back in Fall 2022, Kaiser endured two major mental health worker strikes, which lasted for months and ended with no meaningful results and a deal that did not settle grievances for thousands of therapists in California and Hawaii. In late 2023, Kaiser saw another flurry of union rallies, which led to mental health workers going on a 10-week strike in Northern California.

 

Fast-forward to this month, and 2,000 Kaiser mental health workers—psychologists, psychiatric nurses, therapists, and clinical social workers—authorized an “open-ended” strike on Oct. 21 in Southern California. 

 

In response, Kaiser maintains that its most recent offer provides for 18% raises on top of above-market salaries, better retirement benefits, and more planning time in therapist schedules. The company also accuses the National Union of Healthcare Workers (NUHW) of being determined to strike regardless of the offer.

 

Here are a few more Golden State updates:

  • 7,000+ CVS workers across California authorized a strike while claiming that they cannot afford health insurance premiums on their wages. Additionally, the SEIU-represented workers want the pharmacy chain to beef up staffing and safety protocols, which are particularly fraught issues at the intersection of retail and healthcare.

  • 900 Dialysis workers at 37 California clinics authorized a strike from Oct. 14-19. The group is protesting the partnership of DaVita Kidney Care and Fresenius Medical Care, which the union alleges are maximizing profit at the expense of patient safety.

 Michigan: An impending strike and enacted legislation loom large here.

  • 2,700 SEIU-represented University of Michigan healthcare workers authorized an Oct. 15 strike with a “loud” and “clear” message from the union. The walkout is only planned to last one day but involves an array of specialties, from respiratory therapists to life-support specialists. These workers unionized in July 2023 and March 2024 and are seeking a first contract. Update 10/15: This strike was averted last night when the parties reached a late-night tentative agreement.

  • Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signed two bills that ease the path for 35,000+ home health workers to unionize under the SEIU-affiliated Michigan Home Care Workers United. Those bills will even allow workers who are paid through Medicaid to take care of their own family members as “individual homecare workers” to collectively bargain as private employees. Talk about a union bonanza, and SEIU hopes to unionize these workers through card check when the bills go into effect next March.

We will end this roundup with trouble on the horizon in Minnesota, where SEIU is circling Monarch Nursing Homes. The company's workers admitted to CBS News that they feel “overworked and understaffed.” Earlier this year, SEIU also put workers at seven nursing homes on strike throughout the state.

 Trendspotting: When Unions Decide To Make Broad Layoffs All About Themselves

by Kimberly Ricci

In our current precarious economy, layoffs are abundant across many industries. We’ve previously discussed how unions cannot protect workers from layoffs, but they sure will point fingers. As we will discuss below, those unions also tend to assume that the world should revolve around them.

 

Stellantis: For months, the Jeep, Ram, Chrysler, and Dodge automaker projected layoffs for 2,000+ workers at its Warren Truck Plant. UAW President Shawn Fain threatened to strike against these layoffs, and in response, Stellantis sued the UAW while arguing that Fain was illegally attempting to authorize a mid-contract strike. 

 

1,000 Warren workers are receiving bad news this week with reportedly broader Stellantis layoffs to come, and the company’s financial woes were not helped by 40% raises from the Big Three negotiations in addition to weakening consumer demand.

 

Still, Fain wants to further stress Stellantis’ bottom line by proposing to resurrect the UAW’s “Jobs Bank”-like practice, for which Stellantis would be required to pay salaries to workers waiting for the idled Belvidere plant to reopen. Stellantis answered that it will “not consider reestablishing contract provisions that directly contributed to the bankruptcies of two of the ‘Big 3.’”

 

Wells Fargo: Amid an ongoing CWA organizing push at the megabank, workers at around 20 out of 4000+ U.S. branches have voted to unionize. The union now claims that a current round of layoffs is retaliation against members of a proposed bargaining unit, even though the company has been conducting widespread layoffs throughout 2024. The bank maintains that these job cuts have nothing to do with the union and that managers are also subject to ongoing workforce reductions.

 

Boeing: The aerospace company recently conducted furloughs, a domino effect of the Machinist’s strike, which shut down 737-MAX production lines in Washington and Oregon after 32,000 union members walked out. A month after the strike began, Boeing announced a 10% overall workforce reduction of about 17,000 formal layoffs of primarily white-collar workers. Machinists will be safe during this round, with a spokesperson revealing that the company is “choosing not to lay off employees on strike.” 

 

Walgreens: The retail pharmacy announced earlier this year that closures of “underperforming” locations were coming. After recent quarterly results, Walgreens plans to shut 1,200 stores by 2027. The company hasn’t provided an estimation of how many layoffs are coming. However, it’s fair to assume that some workers will transfer to locations that are chronically understaffed (which surely cannot make unions angry, but we’ll see).

 

Intel: The multinational tech corporation will be cutting 15,000 jobs globally after an over $1 billion loss last fiscal year, and CWA has expressed disappointment and blamed the company for mismanagement. This week, 1,300 Oregon workers received news of their incoming pink slips.


Conclusion: No employer wants to conduct layoffs, although unions still try to twist the news to their advantage. And then there’s ILA President Harold Daggett, who was recently giddy with excitement over his threat to “cripple” the economy and cause layoffs in several industries with his dockworkers’ strike. Double standards much?

Stories You May Have Missed:


The Call Is Out for Mass, Simultaneous Strikes in 4 Years

Link


Union election petitions have doubled since Biden took office, NLRB says 

Link


NLRB accuses Apple of illegally restricting workers' Slack and social media use 

Link


The Long Road to Union Recognition: Trader Joe's Workers Press On

Link


Two NLRB Rulings Are Empowering Amazon Drivers to Organize 

Link


More Trouble Is Brewing For Starbucks

Link


About Labor Relations INK

Labor Relations INK is published weekly and is edited by LRI Consulting Services, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it. New subscribers can sign up by visiting here.


If you use content from this newsletter, please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website: http://www.LRIonline.com 


Contributing editors for this issue: Greg Kittinger, Michael VanDervort, and Kimberly Ricci.


You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.


About Labor Relations Institute

LRI exists to help our clients thrive and become extraordinary workplaces. We improve the lives of working people by strengthening relationships with their leaders and each other. For over 41 years, LRI has led the labor and employee relations industry, driven by our core values and our proven process, the LRI Way.

 

Share