Subject: Five Red Flags that Signal a Leadership Problem: LRI INK

December 12, 2024

To visit the blog post, click on the link below the article.

Five Red Flags that Signal a Leadership Problem

by Phillip Wilson

Great leadership isn't about barking orders or hoarding control. It's about empowering your team, fostering trust, and creating an environment where everyone can thrive. But sometimes, we fall into leadership traps that hinder our team's potential and create a toxic work environment.

 

Recognizing these traps is the first step to becoming a more effective leader. Here are five "red flags" that will help you recognize a leadership molehill before it becomes a mountain.

 

1. "I'll Handle It": The Trust Buster

Do you find yourself constantly taking over projects without consulting your team? This is a classic sign of a lack of trust. In The Leader-Shift Playbook, I discuss my own experience with this red flag. I did a terrible job delegating because I didn't trust my team. This created bottlenecks and slowed down progress.

 

When leaders consistently jump in to "fix" things, they send a clear message: I don't believe you can do this. This undermines team morale, stifles creativity, and prevents individuals from developing their skills.

 

2. "Can They Handle It?": The Villain Assumption in Action

This red flag is the corollary of the first. When you question your team's ability to handle a task, you're likely falling into the Villain Assumption, which describes the tendency to view team members as potential problems rather than heroes.

 

Instead of asking, "Can they handle it?" shift your mindset. Ask yourself: What support do they need to succeed? This simple change in language reflects the Hero Assumption: the belief that everyone wants to be great and has the potential to contribute.

 

3. "I'm Too Busy": The Isolation Trap

Leaders are busy people, but if you find yourself constantly buried in your own projects, neglecting to support and encourage your team, this is a red flag. It is critical to invest in relationships and be available to your team, even when it means carving out time in a packed schedule.

 

Remember, leadership isn't a solo act. You need to be present and engaged with your team, offering guidance, feedback, and support. By prioritizing your own tasks over team development, you risk creating a disconnect that can lead to decreased morale and performance.

 

4. "We Need a Rule": The Theory X Pitfall

Relying on rigid rules and a top-down approach is a hallmark of Theory X leadership, which assumes that employees are inherently lazy and need to be controlled. Theory Y leadership, on the other hand, assumes that employees are self-motivated and desire to do good work.

 

While some rules are necessary, too many rules stifles creativity and create a culture of fear. Instead of resorting to "we need a rule" whenever a problem arises, try engaging your team in finding solutions. This fosters collaboration, encourages ownership, and promotes a more positive and productive work environment.

 

5. Signs of Power Distance: The Communication Breakdown

Power distance refers to the relationship gap or fear some employees feel toward their leader. When power distance is high, communication breaks down, people hesitate to speak up, and essential information can be withheld.

 

Here are some signs of high-power distance:

  • Team members are reluctant to share ideas or challenge the leader's decisions (verbal gaps).

  • The teammate shows signs like fidgeting or lack of eye contact, making them seem uncomfortable around the leader (physical gaps).

  • There are “say-do” gaps that can mean that the individual is uncomfortable saying when they don’t know how to do something or don’t have time to do it (behavioral gaps).

Several strategies can reduce power distance, such as asking for advice, active listening, and vulnerability with your team. These actions foster trust and create a more collaborative and psychologically safe environment.

 

By recognizing these five red flags and embracing the Hero Assumption, you can transform your leadership style, empower your team, and create an extraordinary workplace.

A Healthcare Checkup: Keep An Eye On Doctors Council SEIU

by Kimberly Ricci


The healthcare industry has been feeling an ongoing strain lately, and as a result, Big Labor has had little difficulty organizing nurses. Recent headlines include the Teamsters claiming that over 9,000 Michigan nurses joined their ranks and SEIU declaring that over 1,000 Pittsburgh nurses will rally for higher pay and more time off. 


Doctors, on the other hand? They’re not as plentiful a source for union dues, but that could change. In 2022, the NLRB determined that a specific group of doctors could organize despite their “supervisor” status. That fever spread last year into several U.S. health systems, mainly applying to residents and some ER doctors. Those groups tend to work grueling schedules, including 80-hour work weeks, with lower salaries for residents, who are, by definition, doctors-in-training.


This month, 3000 Philadelphia-area residents from three hospital systems petitioned for a vote to join the SEIU’s Committee of Interns and Residents (CIR-SEIU). The SEIU also wants to turn the tide for full-fledged doctors, and it has an umbrella under which it hopes to stash more new members.


The Doctors Council affiliated with SEIU in 1999 and remains a small offshoot, but it unionized 150 Allina Health Mercy Hospital doctors in October 2023, leading to the first physicians-only union in Minnesota.


Newish developments: Around 400 doctors at Delaware’s ChristianaCare facilities voted to unionize with Doctors Council SEIU. This month, 400 Boston-area primary care physicians at two hospital systems petitioned for a vote to join the Doctors Council SEIU. However, lawyers for one of the systems spoke at an NLRB hearing to contest how many of these doctors could act as part of a potential bargaining unit. If the hospital’s argument is successful, that group could be reduced to 100 doctors.


How big is the Doctors Council SEIU? It’s unclear how many full-fledged doctors belong to the union, which remains cagey on those numbers, likely because they’re not too impressive. Their website boasts that “Doctors Council represents doctors in two of the largest public health care systems in the nation as well as in diverse practice settings.”


Overall, the SEIU claims over 2 million members from healthcare fields. A tiny percentage of those members are full-fledged doctors, but clearly, the union has its sights set on a lucrative target. 


The difficulty in organizing doctors is due to a simple reason: self-employment vs. working for a hospital system. Obviously, a doctor who runs their own private practice isn’t prone to organize against themselves, as opposed to a physician who works for a hospital system and might grow frustrated with circumstances beyond his control. 


Times are changing: In the 1980s, around 75% of doctors worked under their own shingle. That number has dwindled to slightly less than 50%, with younger physicians less likely to work for themselves than their older counterparts. As those younger doctors continue to enter the profession, SEIU will be poised to pounce. It’s a reminder that even workers in highly paid professions could turn to third-party representation, and it’s another reason why every leadership problem is worth fixing.

StrikeWatch: ‘Tis The Season And A Silent Night After A Union Staff Strike

by Kimberly Ricci

We are in the thick of the holiday season, but there’s no rest for the weary when unions have their foot in the door after organizing workplaces. In this StrikeWatch edition, unions have set up picket lines against businesses during what should be the most festive time of the year:


NYC’s Strand Books, the city’s largest independent bookstore with an “18 miles of books” slogan, was left without hourly staff when booksellers went on strike during the biggest shopping weekend of the year. The United Auto Workers are involved and want an immediate $18 per hour wage and nearly 10% raises in subsequent years.  


An REI ski shop in Manhattan saw workers go on strike a week ago over safety concerns. The Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union-fueled walkout also leaves the retailer in a pinch during the height of ski season.


Airport ground and service workers at LAX and the Charlotte Douglas International Airport went on SEIU-led strikes for the week surrounding Thanksgiving travel. The union is calling for $25 per hour for these workers.


Allegiant Air pilots at Des Moines International Airport began the month with a rally as the Teamsters threatened to strike. Fortunately, the federally mandated 30-day “cooling off” waiting period means a strike won’t land during Christmas travel. However, the Teamsters have reportedly rejected the airline’s latest offer of “an immediate 50% average increase in hourly wages that scales to 70% over 5 years” in addition to generous time off and significant pilot bonuses.


Hotel workers in at least eight major cities across the U.S. went on a UNITE HERE strike in late September and largely remain on the picket lines with San Francisco venues in particular noting that they see no end in sight. As of last week, additional workers walked out with the union claiming that a total of 15,000 workers had authorized strikes. The union aims to match hotel industry wages in southern California, reportedly set to reach $35 hourly at 34 hotel chains by July 2027.


In Los Angeles, tourism workers represented by UNITE HERE announced their intent to go on a three-day hunger strike outside of City Hall while seeking a $25 hourly minimum wage.


The UAW Staff Union’s overwhelmingly authorized strike came to a surprisingly quiet end with a tentative deal and a joint statement in which the UAW claimed to have provided “the most generous economic package for temporary organizers in the labor movement.” 


That “temporary” qualifier seemed to be part of what drove the staff union to strike in the first place, especially after the UAW pushed for Big Three automakers to convert temp employees after nine months. In contrast, their own temp employees generally maintain that status in three-month intervals for up to three years. 


The deal’s financial details aren’t public yet, but after a staff union representative previously called the UAW’s raises “laughable,” we will be watching to see how the strike-happy UAW treated its own striking workers.

NLRB News Gone Wild

by Michael VanDervort

Editor note: We published a breaking news item yesterday that included a typo. The correct version is shown below.


Just when you thought the final days of the Biden administration would quietly fade into the holiday haze, today brought several more National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) bombshells.


First, it’s the end of the “contract coverage” standard—a precedent from the Trump era that allowed employers to change job requirements and working conditions without needing a union’s permission (as long as the contract language didn’t explicitly forbid it).


Instead, the NLRB’s Democratic majority just hit rewind, bringing back the “clear and unmistakable waiver” rule. Translation? Employers now must bargain with unions over changes unless the union explicitly waived its right to do so in the agreement.


NLRB Chair Lauren McFerran: “Today’s decision makes clear that an employer has the obligation to bargain over changes to wages and working conditions unless the union expressly yields its right to bargain over an employer’s decision.”


The backstory? A trash-hauling company—Endurance Environmental Solutions LLC—installed truck security cameras without union approval, sparking a showdown with a Teamsters affiliate. The Board decided the move violated federal labor law, and voilà—we’re back to the old pro-union standard.

So, what does this mean for employers?

  • Those broad “management rights” clauses just got a lot weaker.

  • Expect more mandatory bargaining on workplace changes.

  • Union power? Cranked up another notch, temporarily anyway.

Sure, it’s a win for unions, but what about businesses navigating all this unpredictability? And let’s be real—does this all get reversed again when the political winds shift? We have every reason to think so.


Federal Court Rules President Can Fire NLRB Judges

In a landmark decision, a federal judge has ruled that the President can fire administrative law judges (ALJs) of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The judge ruled that the ALJs were being improperly protected by administrative rules that prevented the President from removing them except in very limited circumstances, conflicting with the constitution.


Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump appointee in the District of Columbia, declared that the current "layered removal protections" undermine the President's authority to oversee these judges, calling the process “byzantine” and unconstitutional.


This ruling marks the first victory outside the Fifth Circuit for employers challenging the NLRB's structure. The decision aligns with the Supreme Court's 2010 Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB precedent, invalidating similar job protections for federal agency officials.


The ruling intensifies the constitutional challenges facing the NLRB, which has seen increasing scrutiny from employers over its enforcement mechanisms. The NLRB declined to comment on the decision, and the legal implications for other administrative agencies remain to be seen.


Democrat Attempt to Confirm McFerran Fails

A Democrat-led effort to maintain a majority on the National Labor Relations Board through 2026 failed on Wednesday when Senate Republicans and two independents blocked Lauren McFerran's nomination for reappointment to the board through 2026 for now. It is believed that President Trump would have fired McFerran if she had been confirmed. Most major business groups opposed her confirmation.

Stories You May Have Missed:


Schumer torpedoed by Manchin and Sinema on crucial NLRB vote 

Link


Potential Changes to NLRB Policies Under Trump Administration

Link


Noncompete and Contractor Policies Set to Change in Trump's NLRB

Link


NLRB Judge Gives Approval For Company's Noncompete Agreement

Link


Disney Union Responds After Theme Park Adds AI Robot Replacement System to Eliminate Workers

Link

About Labor Relations INK

Labor Relations INK is published weekly and is edited by LRI Consulting Services, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it. New subscribers can sign up by visiting here.


If you use content from this newsletter, please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website: http://www.LRIonline.com 


Contributing editors for this issue: Greg Kittinger, Michael VanDervort, and Kimberly Ricci.


You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.


About Labor Relations Institute

LRI exists to help our clients thrive and become extraordinary workplaces. We improve the lives of working people by strengthening relationships with their leaders and each other. For over 41 years, LRI has led the labor and employee relations industry, driven by our core values and our proven process, the LRI Way.

 

Share