Welcome to 2025. Over the holidays, the SEIU-affiliated Starbucks Workers United (SBWU) and the Teamsters-affiliated Amazon Labor Union (ALU) claim to have waged “historic” five-day strikes, but was that really the case?
Yes and no. “The Strike Before Christmas” is the SBWU’s nickname for what they accurately call the largest strike in Starbucks history. That wasn’t a high bar to reach since it’s been three years since the first cafe unionized, and SBWU has only unionized a fraction of Starbucks cafes, i.e., slightly over 500 out of 10,000+ U.S. locations. To date, the union has waged strikes as a PR campaign rather than securing results for members.
Not a great track record: In 2022, a two-month-long Boston Starbucks strike yielded no meaningful results for workers. Scattered strikes followed, and in 2024, the company and union reopened contract negotiations and made notable progress with key issues around wages and scheduling remaining. The company now has accused the union of “prematurely” ending year-end bargaining sessions.
New strike exaggerations: SWU claimed that "nearly 300 locations and growing” were “fully shut down” on Christmas Eve in major cities like LA, Boston, and Seattle. The company countered that “only around 170 Starbucks stores did not open” due to the strike. A further Starbucks statement pointed out that 97-99% of their cafes operated normally.
Still, this Starbucks strike was more legitimate than what the Teamsters/ALU fabricated. Both events ended with workers returning to work as though nothing had happened, but perhaps one of these “strikes” was not a strike at all but rather an astroturfed media event with little employee support.
Teamsters’ truth bending: After President Sean O’Brien worked out a closed-door deal to absorb the ALU, the union has still only secured one victory at an Amazon warehouse, JFK8, in Staten Island. Still, O’Brien bragged that the Teamsters would substantially disrupt Amazon deliveries and recruit warehouse workers into a “nationwide” strike on Dec. 19.
How big was this “strike”? Not very. A progressive publication conceded that JFK8 was “operating normally” upon their observations with no indication that warehouse workers joined picket lines, which Teamsters claimed were full of drivers in four states. The turnout for drivers, as well, was not impressive, with mainly Teamsters stewards picketing and maybe “half a dozen” drivers joining at one facility. A left-wing magazine further described attendance as “sparse” outside multiple warehouses.
The end result: This looks like an imaginary strike by the Teamsters, who insist that their 10,000 Delivery Service Provider members should be met at the bargaining table by Amazon, which does not consider these third-party drivers to be their employees. That’s a complicated distinction that isn’t legally sorted out yet. In any event, O’Brien’s claim to calling a “nationwide” strike seems spurious since the Teamsters only represent a tiny number of the nearly 400,000 third-party drivers who handle Amazon packages.
Right now, it feels like O’Brien and the Teamsters rely mainly on lazy media coverage of his press releases and Big Labor-friendly columnists to rewrite reality. Old tricks, meet new year.