Subject: A Union So Fake, Members Don’t Know They Are Paying Dues: LRI INK

January 9, 2025

To visit the blog post, click on the link below the article.

A Union So Fake, Members Don’t Know They Are Paying Dues

by Kimberly Ricci

A few years ago, we wrote about the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) fast-and-loose game with membership reporting by including retired educators who do not realize they are being counted as full union members. The AFT does this to keep their numbers looking less embarrassing in a time of basically flat union density.


A similar but far more sinister situation has been brewing with the Home Healthcare Workers of America (HHWA) union, as a recent investigation by NYC-based non-partisan publication THE CITY has revealed. The HHWA, which claims to have vaulted to 43,000+ members, “up from 14,141 in 2018,” is affiliated with the International Union of Journeymen and Allied Trades (IUJAT). The allegations lodged by THE CITY are vast:

  • HHWA pulls dues from thousands of workers who never signed a union authorization card or voted in an election. These $30 dues cause some workers to take home less than minimum wage, with their contracts requiring arbitration on pay disputes, including overtime complaints.

  • In 2024, the HHWA collected nearly $13 million in dues from low-paid home care aides; over half of that money has gone to IUJAT, and HHWA union officers reaped high salaries, including $1.4 million for founder Steven Elliott Sr., who has since passed away, along with high six-figure salaries for his relatives, who are also officers.

  • These workers aren’t made aware that they are paying dues. They mysteriously stopped receiving pay stubs, which would have shown deductions. They haven’t seen benefits packets or met union reps.

  • THE CITY uncovered over a dozen instances where home healthcare companies signed HHWA contracts, thereby waiving any need for an election for this union to represent thousands of new workers.

You might be asking why these companies signed their workers up with what appears to be a fake union. That’s a valid question, and for starters, a labor attorney declared that the HHWA’s “reps advocate to boost revenue for company owners – pitching it as a win-win that helps workers too.” Yet, as THE CITY further suggests, this selling point cannot be the whole story.


The situation looks more menacing in light of the not-too-distant history of IUJAT-related maneuverings. In 2018, an associate of the IUJAT-affiliated United Plant and Production Workers received a five-year federal sentence for extorting companies through mob-linked interference with businesses to force workers into union contracts. The same MO applied to a Bronx trash hauling depot. The Teamsters were suddenly booted for a mob-led IUJAT local, leading to safety violations and on-the-job accidents piling up.


The HHWA is also looking to become a political force. These aspirations are clear in NYC, where the union endorses local races and has leveraged its increasing “membership” to lobby for the reversal of a state provision that favored SEIU-affiliated home health agencies for budget funding.


Make no mistake; the HHWA isn’t genuinely standing up for the rights of “a group largely of immigrant women working their first job in the U.S.,” as the union’s political director declared about that NY state provision. Instead, this IUJAT-affiliated group wants another door into the home healthcare industry.  These workers deserve transparency from the union and the chance to make an educated decision on whether they want to be represented or not.

New Stuff in the New Year From LRI Consulting Services

by Michael VanDervort

🚨 New Podcast Series Alert! 🚨

We’re excited to announce a new 6-part podcast series on The Left of Boom Show, designed to guide managers through the challenges of a unionized workplace after losing a union representation election.

🎙 Episode 1: Navigating the First Two Weeks

Host Phil Wilson joins forces with LRI Consultant Dave Sapenoff to give you a step-by-step roadmap for maintaining control and staying compliant while preparing for negotiations.

What You’ll Learn:
✅ Defining the status quo: Why it’s critical and how to implement it
✅ First steps: Preparing for post-election union negotiations
✅ Maintaining authority: Balancing leadership with compliance
✅ Effective communication: Keeping employees informed and aligned
✅ Proactive strategies: Managing disruptions and preventing conflict
✅ Strike prep: How to stay ready for potential union actions
✅ Union relations: Building a constructive partnership from day one

This episode is packed with actionable insights to help you confidently navigate the complexities of managing in a unionized environment.

📢 Don’t miss it! Tune in now to gain the tools you need to succeed.

No Foolin'! The Leader-Shift Playbook is Coming Out on April 1st.

by Michael VanDervort

We’re thrilled to announce that Phil Wilson’s newest book, The Leader-Shift Playbook, is launching on April 1, 2025—and it’s already earning rave reviews from industry leaders!


"Phil Wilson does it again! He has followed up The Approachability Playbook with another winner, The Leader-Shift Playbook. His latest playbook provides easy-to-execute exercises and tools that will improve your leaders’ ability to engage their people, which, in turn, will drive results. I know this to be true because I’m a dispositional optimist!"


Michael Esposito, President of Espo Employee Relations, LLC, and former SVP Labor Strategy for XPO Logistics

Phil’s book combines actionable tools with a people-first philosophy to help leaders create stronger connections, build trust, and lead with purpose.


Want to be the first to hear about the release and get exclusive updates, insights, and resources?


👉 Sign up now at YourLeaderShift.com


This isn’t just a book—it’s a game-changer for leaders who are ready to make a meaningful impact. Don’t miss your chance to be part of this movement from day one!

New Year, Old Tricks: Big Labor’s Exaggerated And Illusory Strikes

by Kimberly Ricci

Welcome to 2025.  Over the holidays, the SEIU-affiliated Starbucks Workers United (SBWU) and the Teamsters-affiliated Amazon Labor Union (ALU) claim to have waged “historic” five-day strikes, but was that really the case?


Yes and no. The Strike Before Christmas” is the SBWU’s nickname for what they accurately call the largest strike in Starbucks history. That wasn’t a high bar to reach since it’s been three years since the first cafe unionized, and SBWU has only unionized a fraction of Starbucks cafes, i.e., slightly over 500 out of 10,000+ U.S. locations. To date, the union has waged strikes as a PR campaign rather than securing results for members.


Not a great track record: In 2022, a two-month-long Boston Starbucks strike yielded no meaningful results for workers. Scattered strikes followed, and in 2024, the company and union reopened contract negotiations and made notable progress with key issues around wages and scheduling remaining. The company now has accused the union of “prematurely” ending year-end bargaining sessions.


New strike exaggerations: SWU claimed that "nearly 300 locations and growing” were “fully shut down” on Christmas Eve in major cities like LA, Boston, and Seattle. The company countered that “only around 170 Starbucks stores did not open” due to the strike. A further Starbucks statement pointed out that 97-99% of their cafes operated normally.


Still, this Starbucks strike was more legitimate than what the Teamsters/ALU fabricated. Both events ended with workers returning to work as though nothing had happened, but perhaps one of these “strikes” was not a strike at all but rather an astroturfed media event with little employee support. 


Teamsters’ truth bending: After President Sean O’Brien worked out a closed-door deal to absorb the ALU, the union has still only secured one victory at an Amazon warehouse, JFK8, in Staten Island. Still, O’Brien bragged that the Teamsters would substantially disrupt Amazon deliveries and recruit warehouse workers into a “nationwide” strike on Dec. 19.


How big was this “strike”? Not very. A progressive publication conceded that JFK8 was “operating normally” upon their observations with no indication that warehouse workers joined picket lines, which Teamsters claimed were full of drivers in four states. The turnout for drivers, as well, was not impressive, with mainly Teamsters stewards picketing and maybe “half a dozen” drivers joining at one facility. A left-wing magazine further described attendance as “sparse” outside multiple warehouses. 


The end result: This looks like an imaginary strike by the Teamsters, who insist that their 10,000 Delivery Service Provider members should be met at the bargaining table by Amazon, which does not consider these third-party drivers to be their employees. That’s a complicated distinction that isn’t legally sorted out yet. In any event, O’Brien’s claim to calling a “nationwide” strike seems spurious since the Teamsters only represent a tiny number of the nearly 400,000 third-party drivers who handle Amazon packages. 


Right now, it feels like O’Brien and the Teamsters rely mainly on lazy media coverage of his press releases and Big Labor-friendly columnists to rewrite reality. Old tricks, meet new year.

NLRB’s New Moves to Streamline Case Handling

by Michael VanDervort

On January 6, 2025, NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo issued Memo GC 25-03, announcing updates intended to improve the agency’s case-handling processes. These changes aim to enhance efficiency, accessibility, and transparency while addressing challenges posed by increased caseloads and limited resources. 


Key Changes Already Implemented


To streamline case handling, the following procedures are now in effect:

  • Upfront Evidence Requests: Charging parties must provide evidence, witness lists, and timelines early in the process. Delays in submitting evidence could result in charge dismissal.

  • Written Questionnaires: Standardized questionnaires are being used to clarify issues upfront in common case types, such as the duty of fair representation and bad faith bargaining.

  • Videoconferencing for Interviews: Interviews and affidavits are increasingly conducted via videoconference for non-local participants, with in-person options reserved for exceptional cases.

  • Streamlined Testimony Collection: Interview notes now replace formal affidavits for corroborating witnesses unless affidavit testimony is deemed necessary.

  • Early Screening of Cases: Regions actively screen and dismiss meritless charges or those outside NLRB jurisdiction, absent withdrawal.

  • Proactive Engagement: Regions are initiating earlier contact with charged parties to educate them on the NLRA and explore potential resolutions before formal investigations begin.

  • Efficient Trial Practices: Trial attorneys are encouraged to prioritize verbal closing arguments, request bench decisions, and submit concise letter briefs instead of traditional post-hearing briefs.

Upcoming Changes: Transparency and Privacy


The memo also highlights forthcoming updates focused on improving public access to case information while protecting sensitive data:

  • Anonymized Case Captions: In public-facing case captions, individual names will be replaced with generic designations like “Charging Party, an Individual.” Necessary names will remain within case documents.

  • Public Hearing Schedules: Hearing dates will be published on NLRB docket sites, and additional details will be available through regional offices.

  • Expanded Document Availability: Key documents, such as dismissal letters, Regional Director Orders, compliance notices, and subpoena enforcement records, will be publicly accessible online. Personally identifiable information (PII) will be redacted to protect privacy.

Stories You May Have Missed:


Amazon's Rules for Online Whiteboard Illegal, NLRB Judge Says

Link


Amazon Workers in North Carolina to Vote on Union in February

Link


Union Dockworkers, Port Employers Announce Tentative Deal at East Coast and Gulf Ports

Link


Biden's Nippon Steel block shows how unions and workers can be at odds

Link


Dark Clouds Gather at the National Labor Relations Board

Link


About Labor Relations INK

Labor Relations INK is published weekly and is edited by LRI Consulting Services, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it. New subscribers can sign up by visiting here.


If you use content from this newsletter, please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website: http://www.LRIonline.com 


Contributing editors for this issue: Greg Kittinger, Michael VanDervort, and Kimberly Ricci.


You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.


About Labor Relations Institute

LRI exists to help our clients thrive and become extraordinary workplaces. We improve the lives of working people by strengthening relationships with their leaders and each other. For over 41 years, LRI has led the labor and employee relations industry, driven by our core values and our proven process, the LRI Way.

 

Share