by Michael Knight / Editor.

If ever there was "more to the story," then this is it.

Like more than a few others, I had questioned the FDA's approval of the Pfizer COVID vaccine.

I had wondered - indeed assumed - that there was bribery involved.

And that the FDA was enabling Big Pharma because it did not hold any hearings before giving approval for further use of the vaccine.

I may or may not be right about the bribery part.

But it now appears that I was incorrect in assuming that the FDA was simply enabling Pfizer to continue making billions of dollars by allowing it to go ahead with renaming its vaccine and having it used in future for both primary and booster shots.

Some video links subscribers send me turn out to be gold.

This one is a diamond - if you get my drift.

Karen Kingston uses the FDA letter of approval to Pfizer to explain how they are now required to reveal a lot of information to do with vaccine ingredients, and vaccine adverse effects,

She also refers to one of the original patents for mRNA vaccine technology that proves that there is graphene oxide in the shot.

(In that regard, I am working on producing a pdf file which will explain what that's all about, and how to eliminate it from the body. It'll be out on a day or so, with links to sources, and a recommended protocol that is said to remove these nanoparticles in about two weeks).

In the interview, Karen Kingston says the wide range of after effects that include blood clots, cytostorms and worse (death for instance) indicate that not every shot contains the same ingredients.

She doesn't say this, but I will.

Is that because the Deep State/Globalist plan is to use different ingredients with different adverse effects, so they can argue that "if the vaccine was at fault, everyone would have the same adverse response"?

If you only watch one video today, please let this be it.

And I am certain that you will then most certainly want to pass this on.

Sincerely.

Michael Knight.