Zuckerberg is said to have suffered something like $6 billion in losses, partly because share prices fell nearly 4.9% to $326.23, and no doubt there would be multiple millions in advertising revenue down the drain.
Today (Oct 5) "Santosh Janardhan, vice president of infrastructure at Facebook said in a blog that configuration changes on the company’s backbone routers that coordinate network traffic between Facebook’s data centers caused issues that interrupted communication. "
If you believe that, I have the remains of an iron bridge in Rome to sell you (but we'll get to that in a minute).
Facebook is a Deep State/Cabal operation, hugely involved in censoring any "misinformation" about the jab campaign, and also donated millions of dollars to help the Democrats rig and win the 2020 presidential election.
In other words, it is a Black Hat company...and Simon says the White Hats - through their cyber-geniuses involved in this unconventional warfare - took Facebook and all those others offline for several hours. And there was nothing they could do about it.
Simon's view is that it was a deliberate shot across the bows, a warning if you will, or an opportunity for Zuckerbucks to think about changing his ways, so it will be interesting to see what happens next. Will Facebook ease up on its censorship[?
Or will there be more outages?
I personally wouldn't be surprised if such outages become more widespread, and of longer duration, taking out Jack Dorsey's Twitter for instance, and maybe Google services and Gmail, but we'll have to wait and see.
As for brand loyalty when it comes to users - the encrypted Telegram social platform reportedly had an influx of some 70 million new wannabe's while Facebook was down.
And that's on top of the tens of thousands Facebook deplatformed, along with (reportedly) several billion posts that their "fakecheckers" flagged and removed because they were questioning the official line about Covid and the scamdemic.
Simon's report on Bitchute:-
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nnnt7phgiNQg/
