Subject: Pelosi - China - War Next?

What's Up?

August 2 2022


Pelosi Visits Taiwan - WHY?


First, a subscriber asks a fair question:-

I like your newsletters (but) I am a bit confused at the moment with one of your latest ones. Where it says that Nanci Pelosi was not aboard the plane and that it went to Hawaii. The next thing news is demonstrating that she is in Singapore and on her way to Taiwan.

Can you please explain as to why the accounts differ so much?

Thank you. PW.


They differ because there is a great game going on at present, and you'll always get different information from different sources, especially on the big issues of our time.


Such opposing or different statements on the same subject matter are to be expected, and are best treated as what they are - attempts to sway us to one point of view, or another.


With that in mind, it is our responsibility to do our own additional research, being as objective as we can, while staying aware of the fact that "truth" is a very elusive and sometimes totally absent element in what we are being asked to believe.


The claim that Pelosi was not on board the plane that went to Hawaii was made by Phil Godlewski, and I reported that in my deliberately imaginary scenario about what might be going on behind the scenes.


Godlewski is one of many on the Internet who say they have "sources" and "intel" without disclosing who or what they might be. This is common practice in the mainstream media as well.


This doesn't mean they are always fabricating what they tell us, but what it does mean is that we should allow for the reality that there is always more to the story than we are being told.


Godlewski also suggested that the Biden double might soon be replaced by Senator Grassley who happens to be a Republican, and that resulted in a subscriber emailing this ...


Your wishful thinking has a major flaw. Chuck Grassley is nowhere in line for the presidency.


And I might add, that likely before Kamala Harris would depart, if that’s what she has planned to do (or might be forced to do), she would likely appoint a Vice President of her choice, (or likely the choice of the Deep State who would be giving her her orders), and that person would move right in to the presidency upon her departure.


That’s what happened when Nixon resigned. His Veep, Spiro Agnew had to resign, so Nixon choose another Veep, Gerald Ford, who became president after Nixon.


So in this scenario of the double death of Brandon, Kamala would choose a Veep and that person would become president. Chuck Grassley is not even on the list because he is a Republican.


This is the list from Wikipedia.- LM

(I have shortened the list provided, but it's a very good example of someone doing their own additional research. -MK)


From my perspective and experience as a reporter, nothing we are told - including anything I report - is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. And just because I am a reporter does not mean I am some sort of all-knowing information guru. Reporters are simply the middleman (or middle-person if we must be gender neutral in today's world).


That's why I think it is so valuable for readers to take the time to question and offer feedback which can then be used to benefit all of us.


The bottom line is that there is always more to the story - and in this case, with the media (mainstream) now saying Pelosi is likely to land in Taiwan anyway - regardless of China saying that is a bad move, or that her plane or its military escorts might get shot down, or that she is welcome to land in mainland China if necessary but not Taiwan.... it becomes very confusing indeed.

And then, as I write and take time out to look for an update on Pelosi, I find she has indeed landed in Taiwan. Why are they all wearing masks for god's sake? But is it really her? Or a double? Or a clone? Or a robot?


That's how weird the world of news has become, although the source of this picture and the associated article - The Epoch Times -

https://bit.ly/3znZKlf

 is one of the few remaining objective news organizations on the planet, as far as I can tell (although RT does a pretty good job as well).


Even so, as good as the Epoch Times artcile is in its straightforward coverage of her visit, and its mention of the "bellicose" statements by Communist China, apart from the usual ersatz political-type statement about solidarity and democracy and partnerships, there is no information at all about what the real purpose of her trip might have been.


That's where objective speculation becomes a legitimate tool of analytical thinking. We mentally attempt to connect dots between what we're told, and what else we have learned. For instance, I have learned that there are over 1000 biolabs in Taiwan. One thousand in an island nation of 25 million people? Why?


How many biolabs does the world need? Are those in Taiwan being used to create similar bioweapons to those that Russia has documented as being from US-funded labs in Ukraine? Labs funded in part by Hunter Biden's companies as well.


Is China preparing to invade Taiwan and destroy those labs, as Russia did in Ukraine?


Is this Taiwan visit by Pelosi, and Biden's announcement that he has had the leader of Al Qaeda killed by a drone strike in Kabul and this chatter about a possible nuclear war all intended to distract us from ... from what (pick a subject yourself:-) ... from the potential, but possibly secret, indictment of Hunter Biden? Maybe. Maybe not.


Or is all this talk about the possibility of nuclear war just talk - or fair warning about the intentions of the Deep State?

Nuclear War?

Don't bother clicking on that play arrow in the above image - it's just a freeze-frame I took from a video I watched some months ago.


What it does so well is illustrate how missiles have been hidden in cointainers, which in turn can be carried by truck - or by ship. Such missiles could conceivably carry nuclear warheads.


Given Pelosi's inexplicable visit to Taiwan anyway, despite China's disapproval and the despatch of the US aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan to that area, we surely should be considering the possibility of nuclear war.


However, in doing so, it would behoove us to remember that there is already a silent World War Three underway. And that is the war between the overlords who have infiltrated and controlled world governments for decades, and those who are literally fighting for the future of humanity.


You won't read anything like that in the mainstream media. But if you're among the newly awakened, or those of us who have been researching the New World Order agenda for several decades ourselves, you'll know that the "evil ones" are actually losing their grip, and fighting tooth and nail to survive - which they won't.


Nevertheless, they apparently still have access to weapons of mass destruction. That includes the thousands (literally) of biological warfare laboratories around the world, many hundreds of them established and run with the aid of funds from their Deep State assets in the US.


Their latest ploy, as championed by the World Health (?) Organization, and the likes of Gates and Fauci, is to try and repeat their Covid scare and lethal vaccination campaign by insisting that monkeypox is the next pandemic. But if they expect that to succeed, you'd have to wonder why they're insisting that it can only be contracted through intimate contact, with most victims being homosexuals, and especially those who engage with multiple partners. (Excuse me while I throw up).


Moving on. Billions if not trillions of dollars have been siphoned off to black budget secret programs over the years. This money has paid for the creation of a "dark fleet" of space craft, but also a dark fleet of submarines. Submarines, by the way, if fitted with the right sort of top secret anti-gravity propulsion systems, would be the perfect spacecraft.


As for the seagoing variety, many are no doubt armed with missiles, probably nuclear as well. Such a rogue submarine was used in an attempt to shoot down Air Force One - with President Trump on board - some years ago.

It was fired somewhere out of Puget Sound near Seattle, Washington, but was, fortunately, shot down. Interestingly, Trump established the new Space Force.


President Trump has repeatedly said that under his leadership, Russia would never have gone into Ukraine, and China would never invade Taiwan.


Today, there are many who believe that Trump is really still in control behind the scenes - that Biden and others are just playing their parts in a world that seems to have gone on a very bad acid trip so that more and more citizens around the globe will wake up to how criminal politicians everywhere are united in their genocidal endeavors.


This is just my point of view at the moment, and yours may differ - which is absolutely fine; I'm not in the game of "me right you wrong."


What I see is Trump, Putin, and Xi jinping all personally opposed to the Deep State and New World Order. Therefore, I am sure they would avoid any nuclear confrontation - whereas the Deep State no doubt has its own nuclear arsenal of some sort, and may very well use what it has just because it is really losing the battle.


They would then hop into one or other of their deep underground retreats


I'm also of a mind to believe that Trump knows a lot more about the future than he's letting on to the public. In this case, I just wonder what he meant when he said recently that while inflation is here, something much worse is coming


All the best.


And best be prepared


Michael Knight

Again, there is no obligation - but you'd probably enjoy the short video that explains why I started incorporating a donation option.

Donations at FundRazr


Powered by:
GetResponse