Subject: GEA Newsletter #12 July 20, 2022

Newsletter #12 July 20, 2022

TRAINING UPDATES


Leadership Series Workshops 

In-Person Series - All workshops will be held in Macon from 9:30 am – 4:30 pm. Printed materials will be provided the day of class. 
(For more details about our In-person Series CLICK HERE)

08/17/22 - Leadership I 
08/31/22 - Leadership II
09/14/22 - Leadership III
09/28/22 - Leadership IV
10/12/22 - Leadership V  
10/26/22 - Leadership VI

Virtual Series - This workshop series will be held virtually. 
All workshops will be held online from 9:00 am – 3:30 pm, with a break between 11:30 am and 1:00 pm. Materials will be provided in PDF format by email after registration.
(For more details about our Virtual Series CLICK HERE)

08/03/22 - Leadership I
09/07/22 - Leadership II
09/21/22 - Leadership III
10/05/22 - Leadership IV
10/19/22 - Leadership V
11/02/22 - Leadership VI

Advanced Leadership Webinar Series Part 2

Recommended for: Leaders and Managers across all disciplines

 CERTIFICATE SERIES: Participants will receive a certificate if they participate in six of the seven webinars

GEA Webinars: August – November 2022
In Partnership with The Focus Group
Presenter – Pete Tosh

  1. Progressing from a Traditional Manager to a Strategic Leader - 08/09/2022 11 am EST

  2. Utilizing a Proven Process When Conducting Sensitive, Internal Investigations - 08/23/2022 11 am EST

  3. Strategic Interviewing & Selection: Getting the Right Talent on Your Team - 09/15/2022 11 am EST

  4. Utilizing HR Metrics to Illustrate & Enhance HR's Contribution - 09/29/2022 11 am EST

  5. Improving Organizational Performance through Enhanced Employee Engagement - 10/13/2022 11 am EST

  6. Implementing the Techniques Utilized by HR Strategic Business Partners - 10/27/2022 11 am EST

  7. Building a High-Performance Team -
    11/10/2022 11 am EST

EMPLOYMENT LAW NEWS

Constangy.com Blog

EEOC update to COVID guidance is ho-hum
BY ROBIN SHEA ON 7.15.22
POSTED IN AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACTCORONAVIRUSDISCRIMINATIONREASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONVACCINATION

And, for that, we should be grateful.


This week, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission updated its guidance on COVID-19 and the laws that the agency enforces. In my opinion, it's pretty unremarkable.

Which is good news. "Government regulation" and "unremarkable" go much better together than "government regulation" and "DRAMATIC!!!! UNPRECEDENTED!!!!!"

Anyway, here is the new content, in quick and dirty format. How many of these things did you already know? Most, I bet.

  • It's ok to ask for a doctor's note before letting an employee return to work after a bout with COVID. Or employers can forgo the doctor's note and rely on the guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • It's ok to require a COVID viral test when deciding whether employees are safe to be in the workplace. But the requirement has to be "job-related and consistent with business necessity." This seems to be the most significant change to the EEOC's guidance. Before, employers could simply decide that they were going to test everybody and didn't have to justify their decisions. But, even now, blanket screening will be all right if the standard is consistent with current guidance from the CDC, the Food and Drug Administration, or "state and local public health authorities." Justifications could include level of community transmission of COVID, "the degree to which breakthrough infections are possible for employees who are 'up to date' on vaccinations," and the like.

  • Antibody testing is still illegal, and Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead.

  • COVID screening of job applicants can't be done until a conditional offer of employment has been made. And, as with all post-offer medical examinations, the employer has to impose the same requirement on all offerees in the same job category.

  • However, it is ok to screen even pre-offer applicants if the employer screens everybody who enters the workplace and the applicants are entering to complete job applications or for interviews.

  • If an offeree tests positive but is needed immediately, the employer can withdraw the offer, if (1) "CDC guidance recommends the person not be in proximity to others," and (2) "the job requires proximity to others." Even then, the EEOC says, the employer should consider accommodations, such as delaying the start date until the offeree recovers or letting the offeree work remotely.

  • An employer can't postpone the start date for an employee without COVID but who may be "vulnerable" because older, pregnant, or with a disability. That's, like, discrimination, man. 

  • Sometimes the pandemic might create delays with reasonable accommodation, or even with the interactive process. But employers should try to come up with "interim solutions" as best they can.

  • If an employee can't use Personal Protective Equipment or wear a mask because of a disability or religious belief, the employer should accommodate if doing so will not be an undue hardship. 

  • Employees are responsible for letting their employers know that they need reasonable accommodation. If the employee doesn't ask for an accommodation, the employer doesn't have to make one.

  • If the employer -- rather than the employee -- is the one with a concern, it has to let the employee stay in the workplace unless there is a "direct threat," meaning that there is an imminent risk of serious harm to the employee or to others. And, even then, the employer has to consider reasonable accommodations that would mitigate the "direct threat."

  • It's a good idea for employers to let all employees know that reasonable accommodations are possible and how to make requests for accommodation. This applies to COVID accommodations and to vaccination accommodations.

  • It's illegal to keep older workers out of the workplace because of the fear that they are vulnerable to COVID.

  • It doesn't violate the EEO laws for an employer to require employees to be vaccinated against COVID, as long as the employer considers reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities, pregnancy, or religious objections.

  • Employers may need to adjust their vaxx mandates if the mandates have a disparate impact on employees in certain protected groups.

  • Employers have to keep employees' vaxx information confidential. But it's all right to share it with certain employees. For example, an admin who collects copies of employees' vaccination cards, a front desk employee who has to check vaccination status before allowing people to enter the building, or an employee who administers a COVID testing requirement. But the employees in these types of roles have to keep the information strictly confidential.

  • There is no limit on the value of incentives an employer can offer to employees who get vaccinated, as long as the vaccines are administered by a third party (not an agent of the employer). If the employer or its agent administers the vaccines, the incentives "may not be so substantial as to be coercive." (I could have sworn they told us this in earlier guidance.)


And that's about it! You are now an expert! But here is a link to the real thing. The latest updates are dated 7/12/22.


Image Credit: Vaccination sign from flickr, Creative Commons license, by Open Grid Scheduler.

 Tags: ADAAmericans with Disabilities ActCoronavirusDirect ThreatEEOCEqual Employment Opportunity CommissionReasonable AccommodationVaccinationVaccine Incentives

Constangy.com Employment Law

ABCs of Employment Law: The Fair Labor Standards Act (overtime)

BY ROBIN SHEA ON 7.15.22
POSTED IN ABCS OF EMPLOYMENT LAWWAGE-HOUR


Second of two on the FLSA.

NOTE FROM ROBIN: In March, I began a series of very basic explanations of the federal laws that govern the workplace. The first installment covered discrimination in general, the second installment covered religious accommodation, and the third installment covered retaliation. Last week, I shifted gears a bit and posted about the minimum wage requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Today’s post will discuss the overtime requirements of the FLSA. If there is a topic that you'd like to see covered in the future, please send me an email or leave a comment here.

For these two FLSA posts, I want to thank Jim Coleman, co-chair of our firm's Wage and Hour Practice Group, for keeping me on the straight and narrow. I could not have written these posts without his substantive expertise and editorial assistance.

The FLSA overtime provisions essentially say that a non-exempt employee must be paid for all hours worked each work week, plus properly calculated overtime premiums for any hours worked in excess of 40.


The “regular rate”


The amount of overtime pay that a non-exempt employee must be paid depends on the employee’s “regular rate.” The regular rate is the employee’s straight time pay for the workweek divided by the number of hours worked in that week. If the employee receives non-discretionary bonuses or shift differentials, those have to be included in computing the regular rate, making the regular rate higher. If the employer uses the “fluctuating workweek” method of compensation, that could make the employee’s overtime premium rate lower.

To keep it simple, let’s say an employee gets $10 an hour, with no bonuses or shift premiums. Her regular rate is $10 an hour. If she works a 40-hour week, her regular rate is $400 divided by 40 (again, $10). If she works a 60-hour week, her regular rate is $600 a week divided by 60 (again, $10). If she works more than 40 hours in a workweek, the hours in excess of 40 would have to be paid at “time and a half” the regular rate – 1.5 times $10, or $15 an hour. Easy peasy. The overtime "premium" is $5 of that $15.

Of course, it isn't always that simple.This Fact Sheet from the U.S. Department of Labor has more information about calculating the regular rate.


Exempt employees under the so-called “White Collar Exemptions” are not entitled to overtime pay, no matter how many hours they work. But, with limited exceptions, they have to be paid their full salary for any workweek in which they perform any work at all.


Exempt versus non-exempt


“Non-exempt” is the default. Most employees are non-exempt, meaning they have to be paid at least the minimum wage for all hours worked plus overtime for any hours worked in excess of 40 in a given workweek. Non-exempt employees can be paid hourly, on a piece rate, on a day rate, on a commission plan, or a salary.


Many employers think that “hourly” means the same thing as “non-exempt” and that “salaried” means the same thing as “exempt.” This is a mistake! Salaried employees can also be non-exempt – think of administrative assistants, receptionists, and the like. Salaried non-exempt employees are still entitled to be paid at least the FLSA minimum wage for all hours worked, and to receive overtime if they work more than 40 hours in a workweek. Also, under the FLSA there are minimum wage and overtime exemptions, and then there are overtime-only exemptions, so you have to understand the scope of the exemption that applies.

For an employee to be “exempt” under the “White Collar Exemptions” three requirements generally have to be met: (1) The employee must be paid on a “salary basis” (in other words, not by the hour); (2) the employee must be paid at least $684 per week; and (3) the employee must meet the “duties test” that applies to the type of exemption being sought. (The salary basis and salary threshold requirements don’t apply in every case, but we'll focus on the Executive, Administrative, and Professional exemptions, where they do apply.)

The duties requirements for the EAP exemptions are as follows (quoted from this DOL Fact Sheet):

Executive:

  • [P]rimary duty must be managing the enterprise, or managing a customarily recognized department or subdivision of the enterprise;

  • [M]ust customarily and regularly direct the work of at least two or more other full-time employees or their equivalent; and

  • [M]ust have the authority to hire or fire other employees, or the employee’s suggestions and recommendations as to the hiring, firing, advancement, promotion or any other change of status of other employees must be given particular weight.


Administrative:

  • [P]rimary duty must be the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers; and

  • [P]rimary duty includes the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance.


Professional:

Learned Professional

  • [P]rimary duty must be the performance of work requiring advanced knowledge, defined as work which is predominantly intellectual in character and which includes work requiring the consistent exercise of discretion and judgment;

  • The advanced knowledge must be in a field of science or learning; and

  • The advanced knowledge must be customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction.


Creative Professional

  • [P]rimary duty must be the performance of work requiring invention, imagination, originality or talent in a recognized field of artistic or creative endeavor.

There is an exception to the "minimum salary" and "salary basis" requirements for certain learned professionals. Licensed physicians, attorneys, and teachers engaged in the bona fide practice of their occupations will be exempt even if they are paid by the hour and receive less than the salary threshold of $684 per week.

In addition to the EAP exemptions, some other exemptions include those for computer employeesoutside sales people, and “highly compensated employees” who receive total compensation of at least $107,432 on an annualized basis, at least $684 a week of which is paid on a salary basis, and who perform at least one of the duties of an executive, administrative, or professional employee.


HRDIVE.com BRIEF

Nearly one-third of workers plan to quit: Conference Board

Published July 18, 2022

Jim Tyson / Senior Reporter


Dive Brief:

  • Nearly one out of three workers (31%) plan to quit their jobs in the next six months, and 94% of workers who left their companies during the past year do not regret the move, the Conference Board said, describing findings from a survey primarily of professional employees and office workers.

  • Only 38% of respondents said they plan to remain with their current employer in the next six months, the Conference Board said, citing the June 21-28 survey of 1,100 individuals. Nearly one out of four workers (22%) left their jobs for higher pay, while 17% quit for a more flexible work schedule.

  • “Despite worries of a recession — and the hiring slowdowns and layoffs that often result from a downturn — the labor market remains strong and this robust jobs market is continuing to empower workers,” according to Rebecca Ray, executive vice president of human capital at the Conference Board....Continue Reading>>

***********

Worried about retaining your Employees. The GEA has a tool to help with this issue. 


How GEA can help?

Using the latest employee and organizational performance research, Georgia Employers’ Association can administer a quick and very affordable Employee Engagement survey that can provide your management team with information about your current level of employee engagement. From there, GEA can work with your managers and supervisors to create a program that will enhance engagement and  increase your organization’s overall performance.

GEA has recently improved our survey methodology and reduced the fees to member companies who would like to take this first step towards improving employee engagement in their workplaces.

OSHA.org EMPLOYMENT LAW

OSHA Penalties Can Run the Gamut from Nothing to Millions

By Allen Smith, J.D.

July 18, 2022


Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) penalties for violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) vary based on several factors and in rare instances may lead to Department of Justice (DOJ) or state prosecution for criminal liability.


"There's really no typical penalty because penalty assessment will differ based on statutory factors including gravity of hazard, good faith of employer, size of the business and history of violations," said John Ho, an attorney with Cozen O'Connor in New York City.


The maximum penalty this year for a serious or "other-than-serious" violation is $14,502 per violation. A serious violation has a minimum penalty of $1,036 per violation while an other-than-serious violation has a minimum penalty of $0 per violation....Continue Reading >>



*********


How can GEA help with HR compliance? If you would like to know how contact us:


Buddy McGehee - GEA Director

Email: director@georgiaemployers.org

Phone: 478-722-8282

or

Pete Tosh - The Focus Group

Email: pete.tosh@thefocusgroup.biz


Georgia Employers' Association

Phone: 478-722-8282


Powered by:
GetResponse