Recent Elliot Institute research has shown that the majority of abortions are unwanted, as defined by the fact that most women report feeling pressured to agree to an abortion that violated their own personal values and preferences.
It is our firm belief that population controllers are actually fine with unwanted abortions, as evidenced by their efforts to push the abortion pill to market precisely with the aim of eliminating “the barely educated, unhealthy and poor segment of our country.” For those who see babies, especially born outside the upper classes, as a burden on society, the fact that a “barely educated, unhealthy, and poor” woman wants to have her baby but feels pushed into an unwanted abortion by her male partner, social workers, doctors, or employers is not an injustice….it’s just an alternative way toward achieving the goal of reducing birth rates among the poor.
Still, population controllers normally hide their antipathy for individual rights and preferences behind pro-choice rhetoric. But perhaps that message didn’t get through to the organizers of the University of California in San Francisco Law School panel titled “Accessing and Providing Wanted and Unwanted Abortions.” This is one of two panels at the Law School event Patients, Providers, and Pills One Year After Dobbs scheduled for March 15, 2024.
------------ Posted online with a pdf of the law school event | 
