==================================== 

Melissa Hanson owns MLH Enterprises, LLC, which operates The Interchange Wine and Coffee Bistro in Albert Lea, Minnesota.

 
On November 20, 2020, Governor Walz signed Executive Order 20-99 under emergency powers, which prohibited restaurants and bars from offering food or beverages indoors through 11:59 p.m. on December 18, 2020.

 
In the minds of freedom-conscience People, the order order was an unlawful exercise of government power on its face. The state and federal constitutions as well as the Minnesota statutes harmonize to establish that the executive orders were and are unlawful under common law, unconstitutional under state and federal law, and illegal under Minnesota statutes.

The executive orders operated as law ex post facto prohibited by both the state and federal constitutions as the legislature had established that an executive order as issued would have the full force and effect of law.

The law interfered with the obligation of contracts between private sector businesses who operate under license from the state under the statutory terms of the license as granted altering the manner and conditions for operation of the business —necessarily making them unprofitable.

The governor’s authority to issue executive orders granting the power to direct and control the conduct of persons in the state [outside of the persons in the executive branch] is predicated upon the authority of the governor to declare a peacetime emergency.
However, in 2005 the legislature removed one of the conditions upon which the governor could make the declaration — the condition of “Public Health Emergency”. Thus his emergency executive order based on ‘Public Health Emergency’ is unlawful and without statutory authority let alone constitutional authority!

The language of the governor’s power to direct and control the conduct of persons in the state is conditioned upon a request from the “president and the heads of the armed forces, the Emergency Management Agency of the United States and other appropriate federal officers and agencies” to cooperate in the manner so specified by executive order — if there exists such official request, then the governor gave no public notice of its existence.
At the founding of these united States of America, the People knew the limitations of the governments that they established and ordained for the mutual protection of their unalienable rights against enemies foreign and domestic.

They architected organic law to separate the power that they delegated to their governments in order to check and balance any usurpation of that power that would lead to the despotism and tyranny elucidated in the Declaration of Independence.
The People have been dumbed down and their passion for freedom and liberty has been exchanged for the false promise of safety and security from their servant government now turned master.

The principles of checks and balance exist today in the architected instruments of the state and federal constitutions by the three separate but coordinate branches of government down to the individual executed constitutional oaths of office binding the office holder with the duty to support, protect, and defend any usurpation of power delegated by the People.

Any person who holds and elected or appointed office of the public trust has a sworn duty to execute the power delegated to office with fidelity to their executed oath of office.
Governor Walz exercised power of the office of the governor under color of authority and under color of law to exert his private will against the freedoms and liberty enjoyed by the People of the Minnesota and perjured his oath of office.

Every person elected or appointed to office in the executive branch who executed Walz’s orders perjured their oaths of office.

The checks and balance system architected in the instruments of the state and federal constitutions was wholly nullified.

“Every state legislator and executive and judicial officer is solemnly committed by oath taken pursuant to Art. VI, cl. 3, "to support this Constitution. No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” (Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1,19 (1958).

“[An] official would not be excused from liability if he failed to observe obvious statutory or constitutional limitations on his powers or if his conduct was a manifestly erroneous application of the statute.” Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478, 494 (1978).

"No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it. ... It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who, by accepting office participates in its functions, is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes on the exercise of the authority which it gives." U.S. v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220 (1882).

Waging war on the Constitution for the United States of America is an act of Treason. We are witnessing treasonous acts by this and other governors, those persons under their charge, and the judges who are supposed to protect us from that usurpation of power around the country.

 
On December 15, the Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division received a tip Hanson was planning to start indoor dining at The Interchange in defiance of the Order. Decl. Angolkar, Exhibit 2: Criminal Complaint 24-cr-21-137.

 
On December 16, an agent found the restaurant and bar open, with people eating and drinking.

 
On Dec. 17 Agent Matthew Finkenbiner, supervisor for the Minnesota Dept. of Health issued a letter to report that an investigation revealed violations and threatened an ‘administrative penalty’ of up to $10,000.

 
On December 18 and 19, agents and inspectors also found The Interchange in violation.

On December 21, the State filed an injunction action, and the Freeborn County District Court issued an injunction on December 23.

Hanson continued to keep The Interchange open, as agents discovered on December 30 and January 3, 2021.

While Lisa was in court on another matter, City Attorney Martinez personally handed Lisa an alleged criminal complaint including three criminal charges. Not only was the complaint not signed (a nullity) but Martinez attempted to have the judge hold an arraignment hearing right there on the spot giving Lisa zero time to review and prepare for anything.

On January 25, 2021, the City Attorney filed additional charges against Hanson for an additional six counts of violating an emergency powers order or rule under Minn. Stat. § 12.45 based on the December 16, 18, 19, 23, 30, and January 3 violations.

 
As a form of public protest, on January 26, 2021, Hanson advertised on Facebook her plans to host a “Nail it to the Walz ReOpen MN Party.”. On January 29, as anticipated, Hanson threw the party and an agent investigated, finding people in the bar after 10 p.m.

On February 1, 2021, the City sent a cease-and-desist public nuisance notice to Hanson warning her to abate the nuisance within 30 days or risk an injunction action from the City, including a motion to enjoin use of the building and cancellation of the lease.

On February 2, 2021, Albert Lea city attorney Kelly Martinez filed charges for two counts of violating an emergency order or rule under Minn. Stat. § 12.45 and public nuisance under Minn. Stat. § 609.74(1) based on the January 29, 2021 violations. Hanson asserts on February 8, 2021, Albert Lea Detective Julie Kohl purchased a drink at her business, and on February 9, an arrest warrant was requested of the judge by Martinez. The judge declined issuing the warrant. Martinez also requested the judge impose maximum bail conditions which the judge also declined.

The court attempted to conduct an arraignment via a Zoom meeting which brought out two important points;

 
Lisa was clear that she did not understand the nature and cause of the accusations having previously entered into the record of the court a challenge of jurisdiction and a constitutional Demand for a Bill of Particulars as to the nature and cause of the accusations. 

This written challenge required that Martinez enter into the record, the facts which established that Martinez had standing to bring the complaint based on several fundamental constitutional issues as well as a burden upon Martinez to establish that the court had personal jurisdiction over Lisa. 

 Without these facts being entered onto the record AND properly establishing that jurisdiction was lawfully established, THE COURT HAS NO JURISDICTION and could not proceed to adjudicate the merits of the case.

 

At an intended Arraignment hearing the judge was so pre-occupied with the different issues being discussed he forgot to get a plea entered onto the record. Lisa still has not entered a plea as of April 15. To the contrary, the record shows that Lisa is still waiting for answers to not only the challenge to jurisdiction but also to a Bill of Particulars entered onto the record which is a list of questions she requires to be answered without which the court cannot proceed without violation of Lisa’s constitutional right to due process of law.

One of the fundamental challenges relates to the question of “Who is the plaintiff who calls itself the ‘State of Minnesota’. The constitution for Minnesota only recognizes the state of Minnesota. This is not a minor grammatical point. It is fundamental in law. We suspect that what we have here is a corporate imposter posing as the de jure state of Minnesota. This is a huge issue.

 
So far 3 judges have recused themselves from the case upon Lisa’s written motion enumerating the due process violations on the record.

 
With such blatant sloppiness and denial of due process Lisa then started filing counter complaints on the civil side. However, Lisa is moving her claims declared in the counter complaints in an action at law according to the course of the common law — not according to the course of statutory law or equity jurisprudence.

 
She has invoked her right to set ‘Her’ court as “one of the People” inheriting the the sovereignty that devolved upon the People in common law upon separation from King George the Third from the Revolution. Moving her claims ‘At Law’ is another HUGE point.

 
She incorporated as an exhibit the Law and Definitions Decreed for the Case with each of the initial counter complaints and standalone actions at law which is a lengthy memorandum of law that established the rules of Her Court in common law.

 
There are currently 2 counter complaints on the civil side to the criminal complaints and 4 standalone actions at law which reach a long list of state actors who are named defendants acting in their personal capacity and thus taking on personal liability for a sum total of nearly $200 million. 

Defendants start at the top with the tortfeasor Governor Walz down though every tortfeasor in his conspiracy including Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez, the City of Albert Lea, several Minnesota Dept. of Health officials and inspectors, a host of attorneys in the Attorney General office including the Minnesota Attorney General himself Keith Ellison, former congressman who is a known anti-American Marxist. A couple of judges are also named for their conspiratorial acts in all of this.

Judge Bueltel of the Freeborm county court in the third district of Minnesota held a bail hearing at the request of Martinez, despite neither having established jurisdiction on the record nor responding to any of the challenges requiring facts be put on the record. 

 Neither the court, nor Martinez ever issued Lisa a proper summons according the Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 3 to appear so she didn’t appear. She had no legal compulsion to appear.

 
However, contrary to law, to well established court rules and the personal state and federally protected rights to due process inuring to Lisa as one of the People, the judge issued an arrest warrant anyway and gave the illegal warrant to Freeborn county Sheriff Kurt Freitag.

 
Lisa contacted Sheriff Freitag to advise him of the error and his potential liability if he executed it.

 
A Sheriff Deputy showed up to Lisa’s house with the warrant to arrest her and Lisa informed the deputy that he’d better call his boss before executing the arrest. Recognizing the facts of the matter, Freitag called off the arrest at that time and the deputy left without arresting Lisa.

 
However, Martinez, apparently with a personal vendetta, was unhappy that Lisa had not yet been arrested and applied to the court for an order directed to the Sheriff to a hearing to show cause as to why Lisa had not yet been arrested and why he (the Sheriff) should not be held in contempt.

Freitag showed up to the hearing with attorneys who presented a legally salient argument that, based on Minnesota law, Freitag is entirely within his purview to quash a judge’s warrant. Nonetheless, Freitag melted under the pressure. He threw his attorneys and Lisa’s rights under the bus and capitulated to the private will of Martinez and of the judge to execute the illegal arrest warrant.

 
Lisa made it personally and publicly known that she was willing to turn herself in to the Sheriff and be arrested CONDITIONAL upon his providing evidence that a proper summons was issued from which she was allegedly in violation of that gave rise to the warrant in the first place AND that Freitag establish that there was a finding fact on the record to conclude as a matter of law that the court had jurisdiction for the valid execution of judicial power to issue any form of legal process upon which to compel Lisa to any act without her consent to do so.

 
Sheriff Freitag has not complied with the conditions for Lisa to turn herself in by providing any justification for the arrest warrant. In gross error of federal law under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(2) he has labeled her a ‘Fugitive’ and has demanded that she turn in her concealed carry permit.

Lisa sent Sheriff Freitag a Conditional Acceptance of his demand for her to turn in her concealed carry permit expressly condition upon proof of his claim that he could enforce 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(2) within the exterior boundaries of Minnesota and made a counter claim against him for money damages if he could not provide sufficient proof within 21 days for his claim against the declarations of fact and law that Lisa declared therein.
Likewise, Minnesota officials are conspiring to deny Lisa the benefit of further court hearings using the Zoom meeting technology (which is used on the premise that it’s a safer means to deal with a hearing and the Covid threat) and they are trying to require that future hearings will be in person in the courtroom (even though they still don’t have jurisdiction at this point). And to top it all off, presumably because of the Covid threat, they want to deny any observers coming into the courtroom. This is nothing less than an attempt to set up a ‘Star Chamber’ and is a further abomination to the constitution they have sworn an oath to uphold.

 
This is pure unadulterated demonic tyranny!

 
Meanwhile, The Hanson Court according to the course of the common law and the Law Decreed for the Case was fielding demurrers as motions to dismiss Lisa’s claims at law by the defendants to several the counter complaints and standalone actions at law. The Hanson Court is about to enter judgment nihil dicit in several cases for failure of the defendants to serve and file a responsive pleading before the time expired as duly noticed in the Summons.

 
Those damages on one of the cases are listed as follows;

 
ORDER:
OVERRULING DEMURRER
AND
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Against
City of Albert Lea, Kelly Dawn Martinez, And Detective Kohl
In the state of Minnesota district court
[Sitting for the territory of Freeborn county]

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

Judgment entered, jointly and severally, according to the
DEMAND:
A. City of Albert Lea: Compensatory damages in the amount of $2,500,000.00 and Exemplary Damages in the amount of $500,000.00.
Kelly Dawn Martinez: Compensatory damages in the amount of $2,500,000.00 and Exemplary Damages in the amount of $250,000.00. 

Detective Kohl: Compensatory damages in the amount of $2,500,000.00 and Exemplary Damages in the amount of $250,000.00. 


SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

Judgment entered according to the DEMAND:
D. Kelly Dawn Martinez:
Direct Damages in the amount of $13,000; 

Compensatory damages in the amount of $2,500,000.00; 

Criminal Charge 1 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 2 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 3 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 4 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 5 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 6 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 7 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 8 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 9 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 


THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

Judgment entered according to the DEMAND:
E. Kelly Dawn Martinez:
Direct Damages in the amount of $13,000; 

Compensatory damages in the amount of $2,500,000.00; 

Criminal Charge 1 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 2 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 3 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 4 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 5 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 6 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 7 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 8 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 
$250,000.00. 

Criminal Charge 9 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of 

$250,000.00.

Lisa continues to fight and is now labelled a ‘Fugitive’. She needs support.

 
Prayer support,

 
Publicity support,

 
Political Action support, and

 
Financial support. Help her at http://bit.ly/lisalegal

This case is about much more than Lisa and her business.

 
Points established:

 
Exposes the fraud of the corporate State of Minnesota vs. the constitutional, de jure state of Minnesota.

Exposes the issue of breaching the sworn duty to the constitutional oath of office.

Exposes the “lip service” to the principle of the Rule of Law.

Establishes the judicial, legislative, and executive conspiracy against the rights of the People.

Takes down the Governor, the Attorney General, the AG’s underling tortfeasors, the Minnesota Health Department, inspectors and a malicious, vicious, rogue City Attorney in Kelly Martinez.

 
Shows the world the power of the common law and will set precedent on how the state courts can be neutered from their RICO enterprises operating in as commercial courts for both disclosed and undisclosed revenue inuring to those who promulgate its operation against the constitutional principle founded on the Magna Carta (1215) that justice shall be obtained freely and without purchase.

Re-establishes the constitution for the united States of America and fundamental principles established by the Rule of Law in its operation within a republic form of government in contradistinction to the rule of a man as a king.

Please do what you can to pray, get publicity, help financially as your means allow.  This case is for all of us! 

See you tomorrow night!